Crackv's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[Angry Scott : Ninja!]

Great Start

I thought that was sufficiently hilarious. Keep up the work. Dunno what all these haters be hatin on. That was more than decent work.

ZoVies responds:

haha no I asked them to write in the reviews what I could do better :3
DrPopz sayd some things that could help me pretty good with the sounds :D

thanks and hope you will like my upcoming work too...!

[Gotham Heat]

Loved it, just some plot issues

I give this ten out of ten because of anything on newgrounds it by far deserves such praise, however, in the interest of being an absolute nerd, i raise a couple points.

One, near the very begining you have them state he is a cop killer. While he is framed for the murder of Harvey Dent, Dent is not a cop. He's a DA. In neither of the films does the batman kill a cop.

Two, the batman WOULDNT fight cops, not even the really gritty comic book dark knight stuff from the 80s and 90s had him killing or even fighting cops to any remarkable degree.

Again, loved it, thought it was great and wonderful job, i just feel the need as a batman nerd to speak out in defence of the batman.

MOC-Productions responds:

Well first off, thank you for the great review.

:SPOILER ALERT:

I'd like to clear something up though; when the SWAT leader states that Batman is a "cop killer", he is not just referring to Harvey Dent. He is referring to the cops that Harvey Dent killed out of revenge (Wertz for example), in which Batman took the fall for. In order to maintain people's faith in Dent and the "good" in Gotham, Batman decides that "they must not know what he did", and tells Gordon to blame it on him. So long story short, the people of Gotham (with the exception of Gordon) are under the impression that Batman DID kill at least one cop.

As far as Batman fighting cops, he does (even in Dark Knight in one of the last action sequences).

I appreciate you taking the time to write such a nice review and thank you. Just thought I'd clarify those things.

[Romeo and Juliet- Act 2]

Points for animation and effort.

The animation was well done, to a degree at least, and the style was fitting. R+J are very much in contest with Hamlet for being the first Emos. But besides this, on to the main problem. Voice acting.

Juliet, good. nothing spectacular, but no complaints. Romeo, oh romeo, how he doth suck royally. No offense. It was flat. It had no real emotion. Romeo was a horndog 18 year old who bedded the 15 year old Juliet after a less than a week of knowing her. You might think I'm being cynical here, but I'm not. Romeo was lusty and passionate and full of those fun confusing teenage hormones. Show that in your speech and this could be great. But for now, it lacks emotion and sounds like just reciting your grocery list. I dont mean to say you lack talent, just that you need to put in some better depth of emotion. Otherwise, good show.

Fireplayer25 responds:

Lmao! I agree xD I cannot watch this without laughing my head off every time Romeo goes "Oh speak agian bright angel"

Trust me it wasn't my choice of partner, it was assigned groups and everyone needed to have a part. I was paired off with some boy and I gave him Romeo's lines, I was the girl ^^ Plus, I'm not sure that he even understood half of what he was reading, probebly why it lacked emotion xD

Thank goodness I'm not getting graded on his voice-acting, just mine and my animation. Also side note, Juliet was 13, so not only did he rage his hormones and do her, but he was also being a peodophile :P

[The Clown Downstairs]

Disturbing and grim

A decomposing clown is one thing. A decomposing clown that is STILL ALIVE is another thing entirely.

For a first flash this was incredible. I have trouble believing that you haven't done this before. If this really is your first, then i truly look forward to what you have to offer next!

JohnDavidHeptinstall responds:

I promise its my first lol and thanks for the support! - I hopefully have something more to offer in the future, I'm working on some ideas now.